(photo credit: Andrew Drummond’s blog)

If there is anything we have gained from the whole GT200 scandal at all, it could be the fact that this crazy saga has cruelly exposed just how incompetent some of our most influential public figures today are. This post is just a compilation of some of the ‘big names’ who have fallen victim to the most laughable, yet shocking, scam to have hit Thailand in recent years.

(Click “read the rest of this entry” to see their names and what they said)

PM Abhisit: Initially came out to defend the device, showing his impressive array of scientific knowledge by saying that the GT200 “relies on static charges within the body of the user” which means that “if the user hasn’t had enough rest or is not well-prepared, the detector’s effectiveness will be reduced” (source). Should be credited for eventually making a U-turn and playing a part in putting the GT200 through scientific tests (which they subsequently failed).

Deputy PM Suthep: Has said, among other things, that he was “not so anxious” about concerns raised about the detectors because “other countries also used the GT200″(source). Also tried to quell the worries over the GT 200 by saying that Thailand uses “a different brand” from the device that the BBC had earlier exposed as a fraud (source).

Dr Pornthip: The celebrity pathologist has been a staunch defender of the GT200. The most memorable quotes include, “[The GT200] was effective when searching for bombs and even nails under water.” (source), and “It is not a scientific device and the most important variable is the human operator.” (source). One wonders how much, if any, credibility she will have left after this whole soap opera.

Army chief Anupong: In response to reporters’ angry questions about the GT200, he shot back: “Is the company using you to ask these questions?” (source)

Justice Minister Peeraphan: Made an unbelievable remark after scientific tests confirmed the GT200′s inability to detect anything. He said, “The suspicious point is that if the GT200 device does not work and is of no quality then this device would be unable to detect any bombs, but in the test it was able to detect the bombs 4 times, but not in 16 instances. Therefore, it is necessary to find the reason.” (source)

Last but not least, Science and Technology Minister Khunying Ganlaya: During her special lecture to Thai students in a seminar at Imperial College London on 30 January, she was asked by a participant what she thought about the then-ongoing GT200 scandal. Having tried to dodge the question at first, she eventually said, “Regarding people’s beliefs, some kinds of beliefs are harmless. If these beliefs make people comfortable, we should just leave them alone, shouldn’t we? Some people are happy to worship trees, for example. We don’t need to disturb them, do we?”

(เรื่องความเชื่อนะคะถ้าความเชื่อไหนที่ทำแล้วสบายใจ เราก็ควรปล่อยให้เค้าทำ จริงมั้ยคะ อย่างบางคนไหว้ต้นไม้แล้วสบายใจ ก็ไม่ต้องไปยุ่งกับเค้าใช่มั้ยคะ) (source, in Thai)

Ok. I repeat. She is the SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Minister in the Abhisit government for crying out loud. I suggest the opposition Peua Thai Party file a censure motion against her right now, preferably in addition to an impeachment motion.

And just to conclude, does anyone need to be reminded that out of the six individuals listed above, four are members of the party that “highly educated Thais” allegedly tend to vote for?

Related posts (automatically generated):

1. GT200: The Only Remaining Obstacle
2. Authorities Insist GT200 Does Work, The Nation Says No
3. GT200 Dowsing Rod Update: Gen Anupong Bans Further Purchases Pending Investigation

From this report in The Nation, we can see why the army will continue to use the GT200 device in its daily operations despite the fact that it has failed scientific tests.

Prime Minister Abhisit said he did not want to confront the Army but assigned the scientists who had conducted the test to explain to the officials working on the ground to understand and stop using it.

Ok. This sham device is nothing more than a cheap plastic box, has cost us hundreds of millions of baht, has put the lives of army officers and civilians at great risk, and could lead to arrests of wrong suspects while the real criminals and terrorists freely roam the country.  And the PM meekly said he “did not want to confront the army”? Outrageous.

Related posts (automatically generated):

1. Authorities Insist GT200 Does Work, The Nation Says No
2. GT200 Conclusion: Big Names Exposed
3. GT200 Dowsing Rod Update: Gen Anupong Bans Further Purchases Pending Investigation

Gen Anupong, Dr Pornthip, Suthep, Abhisit
(Photo credit: 1, 2, 3, 4)

The shocking scandal of the GT200 ‘bomb detector’ continues to be the talk of the town. In my earlier post I already looked at the BBC’s exposure of the scam and the frankly unbelievable responses by PM Abhisit and other people from Thailand’s uppermost echelon. To be honest, I think this whole sorry saga has damaged the credibility of these people beyond repair, implicating a whole range of prominent people from top politicians to a celebrity forensic expert. Lives are being put at profound risk because of the continued use of these voodoo devices. Massive amounts of taxpayers’ money are going down the drain or possibly into someone’s pocket.

Anyway, here is some good news at last. Army chief Anupong Paochinda, who previously dismissed angry reporters as having been bribed to question him over the GT200′s effectiveness, seems to be going through a belated process of enlightenment. The Nation reports:

Army chief General Anupong Paochinda yesterday said he would not allow any Army agencies to make additional purchases of GT200 bomb detectors now that the United Kingdom has issued a warning saying the devices are useless.

“Since there are some doubts, we have to delay the procurement decisions until things become clearer,” Anupong told reporters, adding that his orders would not affect any ongoing purchases of the equipment.

[...]

Anupong, backing down after experts criticised the Army for purchasing useless equipment at relatively high prices, said the Army would conduct scientific tests to prove the equipment’s ability.

“I personally want to know if it really works, because my men on the ground insist it does while experts say it theoretically doesn’t,” he said.

Though it looks like the army may not be able to cancel existing orders, this decision by Gen Anupong is still encouraging. Will the other big names soon realise their horrible mistakes too? We will have to wait and see…

Related posts (automatically generated):

1. Authorities Insist GT200 Does Work, The Nation Says No
2. GT200: The Only Remaining Obstacle
3. GT200 Conclusion: Big Names Exposed

PM Abhisit Vejjajiva on his internet Q&A programme, talking about the GT200

If anyone wants an indicator of how low our government has sunk in recent months, there is probably no better one than the fact that The Nation is now talking more sense than the Oxford-educated PM Abhisit Vejjajiva.

The BBC recently conducted an investigation into one of the many types of so-called hand-held “substance detectors” being used by government agencies in a handful of Third World countries including Thailand. The Iraqis are using them at checkpoints to thwart suicide bombers. Thai police forces have them in hand when looking for illegal drugs. Thai troops in the deep south also use them to save people from bombs, for example.

The investigation concluded that the device is completely bogus, consisting of nothing more than cheaply-made plastic and unsophisticated parts. While the model of the detector examined (ADE-651) was different from the ones being used in Thailand (GT200), the UK government has issued a ban on the ADE-651 “and other similar devices” and also arrested the man behind the ADE-651 detector. The BBC makes it clear that no Western government uses these types of detectors. For more information see Bangkok Pundit’s posts here, here and here.

(Click “read the rest of this entry” below to see Thailand’s response.)

In Thailand, netizens and university lecturers have been campaigning against the use of the GT200 for quite a while, but their efforts have proved largely fruitless, with the authorities insisting that the detectors do work reliably and help cut violence in the deep south. The media-friendly Dr Pornthip Rojanasunand has challenged sceptics to observe her team use the device in their daily forensic job.

Now, after the BBC’s revelation, one would expect that the Thai authorities would have seen the truth and stopped using the GT200 by now.  Yet, their responses have been absolutely astonishing, even by the standard of our beloved Thailand.

First we have Anupong the army chief:

In response to reporters’ angry questions about the British-made scanner, Army chief Anupong Paochinda shot back: “Is the company using you to ask these questions?” (The Nation)

Then, another one in the military top brass:

Joint Military Police Civilian Taskforce commander Lt-General Kasikorn Kirisri said the GT200 scanner was very useful in detecting and preventing explosions in the deep South, where violent incidents on an almost daily basis have killed more than 3,900 people to date.

“Not using the bomb detector may affect efforts to restore peace in the deep South,” he warned, adding that there might have been some problems with the detector, but they mostly involved human error. (The Nation)

Then this, a bit more promising but still under the illusion that the GT200 is a real functioning detector:

However, the police believe the bomb detector is not effective enough, with only a 30-40-per-cent reliability factor, which means the chance of it failing is higher than succeeding.

“It is not accurate. If the operator is too close to the target – less than 3 metres – it will not work,” said Pol Senior Sgt-Major Chan Warongpaisit, who regularly operates the equipment in the South. (The Nation)

But what about Dr Pornthip? :

Meanwhile, Dr Pornthip Rojanasunand, director of the Forensic Science Institute and who always uses the GT200, said the UK had only banned the ADE651.

She said the detector was effective when searching for bombs and even nails under water. (The Nation)

Not to be outdone, our dear Prime Minister in his internet broadcast (Thai language):

[My translation]:

In the past these detectors were purchased. If you ask me whether they have been of any use, I’d say “yes, they have.” But a weakness has been found. As far as I know from talking to people familiar with it, a limit of this device is that it relies on static charges within the body of the user. Hence, sometimes if the user hasn’t had enough rest or is not well-prepared, the detector’s effectiveness will be reduced. So, at the moment, the Office of the Narcotics Control Board is asking for similar detectors, maybe with different names or brands, but which  are battery-operated. They will replace the GT200.

[Original quotation in Thai]:

“ในอดีตเนี่ยมีการซื้ออุปกรณ์ตัวนี้มา ถามว่าได้ประโยชน์มั้ย ก็ได้ประโยชน์ครับ แต่ว่ามีการพบครับว่า มันมีจุดอ่อน คือเครื่องนี้เนี่ย เท่าที่ผมได้มีโอกาสพูดคุยกับผู้ที่เกี่ยวข้อง ก็คือว่า มีจุดอ่อนตรงที่ว่า ยังต้องอาศัยเรื่องของกระแสไฟฟ้าในตัวคนที่ใช้ เพราะฉะนั้นบางทีสภาพของตัวบุคคลที่ไปตรวจนะครับ ถ้า อาจจะพักผ่อนน้อยไป ไม่มีความพร้อมเนี่ย ก็จะทำให้เครื่องนี้เนี่ย ขาดประสิทธิภาพ เพราะฉะนั้นขณะนี้เนี่ย แนวที่ ปปส. ขอดำเนินงาน ก็คืออุปกรณ์ในแบบเดียวกันครับ แต่ว่า อาจจะเรียกว่าคนละยี่ห้อหรือคนละชื่อ ที่มีพลังงานในตัวเอง จะถูกนำมาใช้แทน”

Perhaps the PM had been briefed by some security officials before the programme, and that was probably his only source of information. He should be pretty embarrassed to know that even The Nation sounds more sensible than him. From the same report:

Just like the ADE651, no tests have proved the GT200 to be totally effective.

[...]

Yet, the GT200 failed to detect many bombs in the deep South, which led to several tragic incidents. Last October, two bombs killed two people and injured dozens of others in Yala and Narathiwat provinces after the so-called bomb detector failed to detect any explosive devices in the area. However, military officials say the operators were in an excited state, which prevented the equipment from working properly.

In reality though, bomb detectors like the GT200 have never succeeded in double-blind tests. A test of the equipment conducted for Thai authorities by a sales agent resulted in a “random chance” finding, which meant a sniffer dog would be better at detecting explosives.

A 1999 guideline from the US Justice Department regarding commercial explosive-detection systems said so far, there were no devices that could successfully detect specific materials like explosives as part of controlled double-blind tests.

[...]

An Chulalongkorn University engineer said the bomb detector was being used in the deep South as if it were a magic dowsing rod.

Related posts (automatically generated):

1. GT200 Conclusion: Big Names Exposed
2. GT200 Dowsing Rod Update: Gen Anupong Bans Further Purchases Pending Investigation
3. GT200: The Only Remaining Obstacle